Advisory Opinions
Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1. The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.
AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
---|---|---|
11/13/1980
3(1) 3(2) |
Mr. Ronald s. Rizzo |
Whether the proposed Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Plan) of Applied Magnetics Corporation (the Company) is an employee benefit plan covered by ERISA title I. |
11/03/1980
104 |
Mr. Charles H. Harris |
Whether the limited exemption set forth in regulation 29 C.F.R. §2520.104-21 for certain group insurance arrangements is available with respect to the San Joaquin Employers Insurance Trust (SJET). |
11/03/1980
3(1) 3(4) |
Mr. Dan S. Brandenburg |
Whether the WAEPA Group Insurance Plan (the Program) is an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(1) of ERISA. |
10/28/1980
407(d)(3) |
Mr. William A. Kelley, Jr. |
Whether the purchase by the Plan of Vipond & Vipond, Inc. common stock would not violate the prohibited transaction rules of section 406 of ERISA by reason of the statutory exemption contained in section 408(e). |
10/22/1980
4(b) |
Mr. Richard H. Fay |
Whether the Rockwell International Overseas Corporation International Pension Plan (the Plan) is a plan maintained outside the United States primarily for persons substantially all of whom are nonresident aliens within the meaning of ERISA section 4(b)(4) and thus is not covered by title I of ERISA. |
10/09/1980
514(a) |
Mr. Richard D. Sommers |
Whether the State of California's Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (the "California Act") is preempted under ERISA section 514R with respect to the Retail Clerks Unions and Food Employers Benefit Fund, the General Sales Employer-Retail Clerks Unions Supplementary Trust Fund and the Southern California Drug Benefit Fund (the "Funds") each of which is a multi-employer trust fund established pursuant to section 302 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §186 and each of which is an employee welfare benefit plan as defined in section 3(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"). |
10/01/1980
408(c )(2) |
Mr. Martin R. Ganzglass |
Whether the Graphic Arts International Union Supplemental Retirement and Disability Fund (the Fund) may pay its trustees a per diem allowance under section 408(c)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) in lieu of reimbursing the trustees for actual expenses incurred in the performance of their duties for the plan. |
10/01/1980
407(d)(3) |
Louise A. Jackson, Esquire |
Whether the proposed sale of six retail shoe stores by Kobacker Stores, Inc. (Kobacker), the Plan sponsor, to the Plan and the subsequent leaseback of those stores by the Plan to Kobacker would be exempt from the prohibited transactions provisions of sections 406(a) and 407(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) by virtue of section 408(e) of ERISA. |
09/03/1980
103 |
Mr. Daniel J. Robins |
Whether the National Health and Welfare Retirement Association (NHWRA) is an "insurance company" within the meaning of the definition of the term "investment manager" in section 3(38) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), and an insurance carrier regulated and supervised and subject to periodic examination by a State agency within the meaning of 29 CFR §2520.103-4 (which provides an exemption from certain annual reporting requirements for assets held in an insurance company pooled separate account). |
09/23/1980
407 |
Mr. Christopher J. Sues |
Whether the common stock of Diamond would constitute a "qualifying employer security" within the meaning of ERISA section 407(d) with respect to a savings and stock bonus plan which Escher proposes to adopt for its employees. |