Advisory Opinions
Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1. The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.
AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
---|---|---|
07/14/1982
3(14) 3(14)(G) 3(21)(A) 401(b) 406(a) 406(b) 408(b)(2) 408(c )(2) |
Mr. Brent R. Armstrong, Esquire |
Whether the formation and operation of Pension Equity Growth Trust, a pooled trust of the type described in Revenue Ruling 81-100 to provide qualified employee benefit plans with a vehicle for pooling a portion of their assets for investments in real estate, real estate loans and, to some extent, in government securities, raises prohibited transactions under ERISA. |
07/07/1982
403 |
James D. Hutchinson, Esquire |
Whether Analytic, a registered investment adviser and a fiduciary of the Fund, or any other person selected as investment manager for the Fund, would be considered an "investment manager," as defined in section 3(38) of ERISA, with respect to each employee benefit plan participating in the Fund. Whether a named fiduciary of a plan participating in the Fund would be considered to have delegated authority to the Fund's investment manager to manage, acquire, or dispose of plan assets in accordance with section 403(a)(2) of ERISA. |
07/02/1982
3(1) 3(2) |
Mr. Ralph O. Winger |
Whether the Forest Oil Corporation and Forest Oil of Canada, Ltd. Division Overriding Royalty Bonus Plan is an employee benefit plan within the meaning of ERISA section 3(3) and thus is covered by ERISA title I. |
06/21/1982
|
Mr. William D. Hyatt |
Whether the Massachusetts Laborers Health and Welfare Fund, the Rhode Island Laborers Health and Welfare Heavy Construction Trust Fund, the Rhode Island Laborers Health and Welfare Fund, and the Broward County Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund (hereinafter referred to as the Plans) are covered by ERISA. |
06/16/1982
3(2) |
Mr. Garry P. Jerome |
Whether the individual retirement account (IRA) payroll deduction program of the Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) would constitute an employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(2) of ERISA. |
06/09/1982
408(b)(2) |
Mr. Larry R. Linhart |
Whether the provision of trust services, including investment management, and brokerage services by the Ohio Company to employee benefit plans under contracts with the plan sponsors where all costs for the services will be paid directly by the plan sponsors is prohibited under ERISA. |
06/08/1982
3(1) 3(4) |
Mr. Kendrick King |
Whether the Jacobs Fork Operation Burial Fund Association, a voluntary association of employees at a coal mine site in McDowell County, West Virginia that provides death benefits in the event of the death of a member or of certain dependents of a member, is covered by ERISA. |
06/04/1982
|
Mary L. Burton, Assistant Vice President |
Whether the offering by Home Federal Savings and Loan Association of its High Yield Plan as an investment alternative to individual retirement account plans and Keogh plans for which it serves as trustee would cause the plans to be disqualified under section 4975 of the Code. |
05/21/1982
3(2) 403(c )(1) 404(a)(1) 514 |
Honorable Jose Enrique Arraras |
Whether a bill amending the Puerto Rico income tax law by authorizing the establishment of Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) in Puerto Rico and establishing the conditions under which IRA contributions will be deductible under the Puerto Rican income tax law would be preempted by ERISA. |
05/12/1982
3(21)(A) 406(b) 408(b)(2) 408(b)(8) |
Mr. Ben E. Benjamin |
Whether the provision of investment management services by SPNB and/or its affiliates in connection with the maintenance of a common or collective trust fund violates the prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA? Whether it would be exempt from the prohibitions of section 406 of ERISA if the conditions of section 408(b)(8) are met? |