Advisory Opinions

Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1.  The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.

Data Dictionary

1984
AO/ Date/ Reference Recipient Description of Request
11/01/1984
3(1)

Mr. Thomas F. Phalen, Jr.
Kircher and Phalen
Suite 2312 Kroger Building
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-1159

Whether the Continuing Unemployment Proficiency and Training Fund to be added to the IBEW Local No. 212 (the Union) Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund may provide benefits included in the definition of an employee welfare benefit plan in section 3(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

10/26/1984
3(1)
3(4)
3(40)
3(5)
514(b)(6)

Mr. Craig A. Smith
Hershner, Hunter, Miller, Moulton & Andrews
P.O. Box 763
Springfield, Oregon 97477

Whether an insurance program offered by the California Autobody Association (CAA) for the benefit of its members' qualified employees is an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(1) of title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

10/26/1984
3(1)

Mr. Stuart H. Young, Jr.
Hill, Farrer & Burrill
Thirty-Fourth Floor Union Bank Square
445 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, California 90071

Whether the Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee (SCLMCC) is an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(1) of title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

10/25/1984
514

Tony Sholar, Director
Business-Government Relations
Kentucky Chamber of Commerce
P.O. Box 817
Frankfort, Kentucky 40602

Whether Kentucky General Assembly's enactment of House Bill 670, which included provisions affecting pension plans governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), is preempted by ERISA section 514.

10/25/1984

Mr. Richard Y. Stevens
Assistant County Manager
County of Wake
P.O. Box 550
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602

Whether the County of Wake, North Carolina Medical Benefits Trust (the Trust) is a governmental plan within the meaning of section 3(32) of title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and therefore is excluded from coverage under that title by section 4(b)(1) of ERISA.

10/17/1984

Mr. Eric R. Jankel
Executive Director
The Narragansett Bay Commission
57 Eddy Street
Providence, Rhode Island 02903

Whether the Bay Commission’s employee benefit arrangement for its employees who do not participate in Rhode Island’s retirement system constitutes a governmental plan excluded from title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

09/27/1984
407

Mr. Richard A. Watts
Price Waterhouse
1801 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006

Whether Santa Fe Southern Pacific Corporation (SFSP) received by the Southern Pacific Company Stock Purchase and Savings Plan (the Plan). in exchange for stock in the Southern Pacific Company and Santa Fe Industries, Inc, constitutes "qualifying employer securities" within the meaning of section 407(d)(5) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

09/14/1984
3(2)

Mr. Lewis A. Siegel
Laiken, Siegel & Co.
71 Union Avenue
Rutherford, New Jersey 07070

Whether the Pension Fund of Local One, Amalgamated Lithographers of America (the Local One Plan) and the ALA-Lithographic Industry Pension Plan (the ALA Plan) constitute a single employee benefit plan for the purposes of title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act).

08/22/1984
3(2)
406
407

Mr. Thomas H. Rogers, III
Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman, & Ashmore
Candler Building, Suite 1400
127 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30043

Whether the Department of Labor will deem The Southern Company (Southern) to have established an employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(2) of title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 by partnering with The First National Bank of Atlanta to offer Individual Retirement Accounts that invest in Sothern’s Common Stock.

07/16/1984
408(b)(4)

Richard A. Gilbert
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
600 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, California 94111

Whether the relief from prohibited transactions provided by the Department of Labor’s Prohibited Transaction Exemption 83-1 will be available for certain transactions involving mortgage pools which consist of the Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association (the Bank) new form of Short-Term Mortgage Loan, and whether the placement of principal prepayment amounts in Bank deposit accounts will be exempt from the prohibited transaction provisions of section 406 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) by virtue of section 408(b)(4) of ERISA.